From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLain v. Al Turi Landfill, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1989
147 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 21, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion is denied and the complaint and third-party complaint, together with any cross claims for indemnification, are reinstated.

Contrary to the conclusions of the Supreme Court, we find that the respondent has not established that it is entitled to a judgment dismissing the complaint, as a matter of law. The record reveals, inter alia, that the respondent owned the equipment which had been utilized by the plaintiff at the time of the incident and that the respondent maintained a managerial office at the transfer station where the waste material was loaded. Thus, triable issues of fact exist as to the degree of the respondent's involvement in the management, control or supervision of the landfill operations at issue in this case. Moreover, since discovery has not yet been completed, an award of summary judgment, at this juncture, would be premature. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McLain v. Al Turi Landfill, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1989
147 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

McLain v. Al Turi Landfill, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL McLAIN et al., Appellants, v. AL TURI LANDFILL, INC., Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
538 N.Y.S.2d 27

Citing Cases

Santiago v. Atlantic Refining Mktg. Corp.

The record reveals that defendant owned the premises where plaintiff was injured and that it required the…