From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mcknight v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware
May 16, 2005
872 A.2d 959 (Del. 2005)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

affirming the trial court's refusal to certify an interlocutory appeal because "while the particular exclusion at issue ha[d] not previously been interpreted in Delaware, the trial court applied well-established principles of contract interpretation and thus the case did not involve a matter of first impression"

Summary of this case from Tetragon Fin. Grp. v. Ripple Labs Inc.
See 11 Summaries

Opinion

No. 161, 2005.

May 16, 2005.

Appeal from Superior CA 04C-09-134.

Decision without published opinion. Appeal refused.

Summaries of

Mcknight v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware
May 16, 2005
872 A.2d 959 (Del. 2005)

affirming the trial court's refusal to certify an interlocutory appeal because "while the particular exclusion at issue ha[d] not previously been interpreted in Delaware, the trial court applied well-established principles of contract interpretation and thus the case did not involve a matter of first impression"

Summary of this case from Tetragon Fin. Grp. v. Ripple Labs Inc.

affirming denial of certification even though "the particular exclusion at issue ha[d] not previously been interpreted in Delaware" because the court "applied well-established principles of contract interpretation"

Summary of this case from Northrop Grumman Innovation Sys. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.

affirming the Delaware Superior Court's refusal to certify an interlocutory appeal because "while the particular exclusion at issue ha[d] not previously been interpreted in Delaware, the trial court applied well-established principles of contract interpretation and thus the case did not involve a matter of first impression."

Summary of this case from Thomas v. Headlands Tech Principal Holdings, L.P.

affirming the Delaware Superior Court's refusal to certify an interlocutory appeal because "while the particular exclusion at issue ha[d] not previously been interpreted in Delaware, the trial court applied well-established principles of contract interpretation and thus the case did not involve a matter of first impression."

Summary of this case from Rite Aid Corp. v. ACE Am. Ins. Co.

affirming the Delaware Superior Court's refusal to certify an interlocutory appeal because "while the particular exclusion at issue ha[d] not previously been interpreted in Delaware, the trial court applied well-established principles of contract interpretation and thus the case did not involve a matter of first impression."

Summary of this case from Steadfast Ins. Co. v. DBI Servs., LLC

declining interlocutory appeal where "the trial court applied well-established principles of contract interpretation and thus the case did not involve a matter of first impression"

Summary of this case from Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co.

declining interlocutory appeal where "the trial court applied well-established principles of contract interpretation and thus the case did not involve a matter of first impression"

Summary of this case from Thomas v. Headlands Tech Principal Holdings, L.P.

declining interlocutory appeal where "the trial court applied well-established principles of contract interpretation and thus the case did not involve a matter of first impression"

Summary of this case from Rite Aid Corp. v. ACE Am. Ins. Co.

declining interlocutory appeal where "the trial court applied well-established principles of contract interpretation and thus the case did not involve a matter of first impression"

Summary of this case from Wind Point Partners VII-A, L.P. v. Insight Equity A.P. X Co.

declining interlocutory appeal where "the trial court applied well-established principles of contract interpretation and thus the case did not involve a matter of first impression"

Summary of this case from Realogy Holdings v. SIRVA Worldwide

declining interlocutory appeal where "the trial court applied well-established principles of contract interpretation and thus the case did not involve a matter of first impression"

Summary of this case from REJV5 AWH Orlando, LLC v. AWH Orlando Member, LLC
Case details for

Mcknight v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:McKNIGHT v. USAA CAS. INS. CO

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: May 16, 2005

Citations

872 A.2d 959 (Del. 2005)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Headlands Tech Principal Holdings, L.P.

Super. July 25, 2019). McKnight v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 872 A.2d 959 (Del. 2005) (affirming the Delaware…

Rite Aid Corp. v. ACE Am. Ins. Co.

Super. July 25, 2019). McKnight v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 872 A.2d 959 (Del. 2005) (affirming the Delaware…

10 Citing Cases