From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKneialy v. Allison

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 3, 2013
CV 11-6729 MWF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2013)

Opinion


STEVEN ERIC McKNEIALY, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent. No. CV 11-6729 MWF (FFM). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 3, 2013.

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the First Amended Petition on the merits with prejudice.


Summaries of

McKneialy v. Allison

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 3, 2013
CV 11-6729 MWF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2013)
Case details for

McKneialy v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN ERIC McKNEIALY, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jul 3, 2013

Citations

CV 11-6729 MWF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2013)