Opinion
Submitted May 27, 1938 —
Decided September 16, 1938.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 119 N.J.L. 605.
For the respondents, Ezra W. Karkus.
For the appellant, Coult, Satz Tomlinson.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.