From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKissic v. Thompson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:21-cv-0522 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0522 JAM CKD P

06-28-2021

ROBERT DOMONE MCKISSIC, Petitioner, v. PAUL THOMPSON, Respondent.


ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 21, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 21, 2021, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

McKissic v. Thompson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:21-cv-0522 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

McKissic v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT DOMONE MCKISSIC, Petitioner, v. PAUL THOMPSON, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0522 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)