From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinnon v. Garrett

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 7, 2024
2:23-cv-00087-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 7, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00087-LPR

02-07-2024

RODERICK MCKINNON Reg #03088-017, PLAINTIFF v. C. GARRETT, Warden, FCI - Forrest City, Arkansas, DEFENDANT


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (RD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin. No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the RD and careful consideration of the entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the RD in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects.

Doc. 10.

Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is clearly not entitled to the relief requested. Indeed, this is so clear that no hearing is warranted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McKinnon v. Garrett

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 7, 2024
2:23-cv-00087-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 7, 2024)
Case details for

McKinnon v. Garrett

Case Details

Full title:RODERICK MCKINNON Reg #03088-017, PLAINTIFF v. C. GARRETT, Warden, FCI …

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 7, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-00087-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 7, 2024)