From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney v. Unknown

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 3, 2021
CV 21-4122-JGB (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2021)

Opinion

CV 21-4122-JGB (KS)

06-03-2021

Alonzo McKinney v. Unknown


Present: The Honorable: Karen L. Stevenson, United States Magistrate Judge.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

On May 12, 2021, Plaintiff, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a two-page document titled “citizen complaint on San Diego Court Clerk.” (Dkt. No. 1.) The substance of the Complaint is difficult to discern; however, it appears Plaintiff claims that the state court clerk denied him access to the courts. (Id. at 2.)

However, the Complaint provides no specific statement of facts. Accordingly, the Complaint is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (Congress requires district courts to dismiss civil rights complaints brought by prisoners if the court determines that the complaint, or any portion thereof, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted). The Complaint also appears to sue a court clerk, who is entitled to immunity from damages for civil rights violations for tasks that are integral to the judicial process. See Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court, Dist. of Nev., 828 F.2d 1385, 1390 (9th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 108 S.Ct. 2031 (1988).

On May 18, 2021, the Court notified Plaintiff that he had failed to pay the filing fee and had not filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Dkt. No. 2.) Accordingly, because Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor obtained authorization to proceed without prepayment of the fee, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, no later than June 24, 2021, why the action should not be dismissed.

To that end, the Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the Central District's form Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support (CV-60P). To discharge this Order and proceed with his case, Plaintiff must either: (1) pay the $402 filing fee in full; or (2) file the completed forms, and the necessary documentation, with the Court on or before the June 4, 2021 deadline.

Plaintiff's failure to timely comply with this Order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of his case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McKinney v. Unknown

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 3, 2021
CV 21-4122-JGB (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2021)
Case details for

McKinney v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:Alonzo McKinney v. Unknown

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 3, 2021

Citations

CV 21-4122-JGB (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2021)