From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Jul 22, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-353 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-353

07-22-2019

DUANE MCKINNEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Duane McKinney, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that a motion for summary judgment filed by the respondent be granted and the petition denied pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. No objections were filed.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. A final judgment shall be entered denying the petition.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 22nd day of July, 2019.

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McKinney v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Jul 22, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-353 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 2019)
Case details for

McKinney v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DUANE MCKINNEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Jul 22, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-353 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 2019)