From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb 11, 2014
423 S.W.3d 290 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 99799.

2014-02-11

Brandon McKINNEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 1122–CC02270, Thomas C. Clark II, Judge.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Brandon McKinney appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

McKinney v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb 11, 2014
423 S.W.3d 290 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

McKinney v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brandon McKINNEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Feb 11, 2014

Citations

423 S.W.3d 290 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)