From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 4, 2001
797 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 2001)

Opinion

No. SC00-519.

October 4, 2001.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance First District — Case No. 1D98-2395 (Duval County).

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Fred Parker Bingham II, Assistant Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Tallahassee Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, and Charmaine M. Millsaps, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent.


We have for review a decision on the following question certified to be of great public importance:

DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

McKinney v. State, 751 So.2d 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

In State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla. 2000), we answered the certified question in the negative. We therefore discharge jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McKinney v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 4, 2001
797 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 2001)
Case details for

McKinney v. State

Case Details

Full title:Leonard McKINNEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 4, 2001

Citations

797 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 2001)