From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney v. Shinn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 26, 2017
Case No. CV 17-00648 DOC (RAO) (C.D. Cal. May. 26, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-00648 DOC (RAO)

05-26-2017

DAVID ANTHONY McKINNEY, Petitioner, v. DAVID SHINN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The time for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss is granted, Petitioner's request regarding production of his legal materials is denied as moot, and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. DATED: May 26, 2017

/s/_________

DAVID O. CARTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McKinney v. Shinn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 26, 2017
Case No. CV 17-00648 DOC (RAO) (C.D. Cal. May. 26, 2017)
Case details for

McKinney v. Shinn

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ANTHONY McKINNEY, Petitioner, v. DAVID SHINN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 26, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 17-00648 DOC (RAO) (C.D. Cal. May. 26, 2017)