McKinney v. Scott

1 Citing case

  1. Brock v. Kelley

    85 S.W.2d 274 (Tex. Civ. App. 1935)   Cited 4 times

    In this connection we conclude it would not be necessary to state in said judgment that the appellants-relators refused to amend for the reason that the trial judge sustained the general demurrer because he had no jurisdiction to hear the application for appointment of a receiver. Texas Land Loan Co. et al. v. Winter, 93 Tex. 560, 57 S.W. 39; Oilmen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. Harris et al., 116 Tex. 247, 288 S.W. 809; Kuehn v. Kuehn (Tex.Com.App.) 242 S.W. 719; Hill et al. v. Nolan et al. (Tex.Civ.App.) 147 S.W. 365; Saffle v. Jones County (Tex.Civ.App.) 5 S.W.2d 185; Johnson v. Sunset Stores, Inc. (Tex.Civ.App.) 27 S.W.2d 644; McKinney et al. v. Scott et al. (Tex.Civ.App.) 35 S.W.2d 459. We shall next consider appellants-relators' application for mandamus.