From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney v. Rocha

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 4, 2024
CV 24-02295 JGB (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-02295 JGB (KS)

06-04-2024

ALONZO MCKINNEY, Petitioner, v. ROCHA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.


Summaries of

McKinney v. Rocha

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 4, 2024
CV 24-02295 JGB (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2024)
Case details for

McKinney v. Rocha

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO MCKINNEY, Petitioner, v. ROCHA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 4, 2024

Citations

CV 24-02295 JGB (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2024)