From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney v. Pfeiffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 21, 2017
Case No. CV 15-05268-JAK (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-05268-JAK (DTB)

03-21-2017

ALONZO MCKINNEY, Petitioner, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Acting Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. DATED: March 21, 2017

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McKinney v. Pfeiffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 21, 2017
Case No. CV 15-05268-JAK (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2017)
Case details for

McKinney v. Pfeiffer

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO MCKINNEY, Petitioner, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Acting Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 21, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 15-05268-JAK (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2017)