From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 22, 2000
272 A.D.2d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued April 14, 2000.

May 22, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated June 30, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment as untimely.

Cullen and Dykman, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Joseph C. Fegan of counsel), for appellant.

Michael Quintana (Ephrem Wertenteil, New York, N.Y., of counsel), for respondents.

Before: DANIEL W. JOY, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a determination of the plaintiffs' application for an extension of time to serve and file opposition papers on the motion, and for a new determination of the motion.

The infant plaintiff allegedly was injured when she slipped and fell in the defendant's stairwell. The defendant moved for summary judgment, claiming that it did not create or have actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition. The plaintiffs sought an extension of time to serve and file opposition papers. The Supreme Court denied the defendant's motion as untimely without ruling on the plaintiffs' application.

Contrary to the conclusion of the Supreme Court, the defendant's motion was timely made (see, CPLR 2211; 3212[a]; Russo v. Eveco Dev. Corp., 256 A.D.2d 566). We further note that the defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837; Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp., 84 N.Y.2d 967). However, the Supreme Court did not rule on the question of whether the plaintiffs should be afforded additional time to submit papers to rebut that showing.

Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a determination of the plaintiffs' application for an extension of time to serve and file opposition papers, and for a new determination of the motion.

JOY, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McKinney v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 22, 2000
272 A.D.2d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

McKinney v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:LASHAUN McKINNEY, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 22, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 893