From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney v. Morton

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1958
102 S.E.2d 449 (N.C. 1958)

Opinion

Filed 26 March, 1958.

Boundaries 7 — Plaintiff may not take a voluntary nonsuit in a processioning proceeding.

APPEAL by defendants from Froneberger, J., at September 1957 Term, of MITCHELL.

R. W. Wilson, for petitioners, appellees.

G.D. Bailey, W. E. Anglin, for defendants, appellants.


Processioning proceeding for establishment of true location of dividing line between lands of petitioners and lands of respondents as set forth in pleadings filed.

Petitioners were permitted to submit to judgment as of voluntary nonsuit. Defendants excepted thereto, and from judgment signed appeal to Supreme Court and assign error.


Where, in a processioning proceeding, the only real controversy is as to the true location of the dividing line between the lands of the petitioners and of the respondents the cause should not be dismissed as in case of nonsuit. See Cornelison v. Hammond, 225 N.C. 535, 35 S.E.2d 633; Brown v. Hodges, 230 N.C. 746, 55 S.E.2d 498; Plemmons v. Cutshall, 234 N.C. 506, 67 S.E.2d 501, under authority of which the judgment of voluntary nonsuit entered below is hereby

Reversed.


Summaries of

McKinney v. Morton

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1958
102 S.E.2d 449 (N.C. 1958)
Case details for

McKinney v. Morton

Case Details

Full title:ZEYLAND McKINNEY AND WIFE, RACHEL McKINNEY v. H. M. MORTON AND WIFE…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1958

Citations

102 S.E.2d 449 (N.C. 1958)
102 S.E.2d 449