McKinney v. Cnty. of Imperial

Full title: ALONZO McKINNEY, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF IMPERIAL, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2019

No. CV 18-7198 JAK (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2019)

Opinion

No. CV 18-7198 JAK (FFM)

01-30-2019

ALONZO McKINNEY, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF IMPERIAL, et al., Defendants.

JOHN A. KRONSTADT United States District Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) plaintiff's damages claims against the CDCR, Calipatria State Prison, Ironwood State Prison, and Kern Valley State Prison are dismissed with prejudice;

(2) plaintiff's claims based on the failure to prosecute inmate G. Williams are dismissed with prejudice;

/ / /

(3) plaintiff's claims against M. Voong and J. Lewis are dismissed with prejudice;

(4) plaintiff's claims based on California Penal Code § 1054 are dismissed with prejudice; and

(5) plaintiff is granted 30 days' leave to file an amended pleading in accordance with the Report.

Dated: January 30, 2019

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

United States District Judge