Opinion
CV 09-6348-PK.
March 3, 2011
OPINION AND ORDER
On February 7, 2011, Magistrate Judge Paul Papak filed Findings and Recommendation (doc. 23) that the court remand this action to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.
The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Neither party timely filed objections. This relieves me of my obligation to review Magistrate Judge Papak's factual and legal conclusions de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Having reviewed the record, I find no error.
Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 23), and REMAND this action to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 3rd day of March, 2011.