From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinley v. Cnty. of Fresno

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 17, 2021
1:21-cv-00754-NE-SAB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00754-NE-SAB

08-17-2021

DOUGLAS MCKINLEY, II, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE AND DISMISSING ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFFS' FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE

(DOC. NO. 5)

Plaintiffs Douglas McKinley, II, and Joanna McKinley filed the complaint commencing this action on May 10, 2021. (Doc. No. 1.) Along with the complaint, one of the plaintiffs filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 12, 2021, the magistrate judge ordered plaintiffs to file long form applications to proceed in forma pauperis, however, plaintiffs never submitted such applications nor otherwise responded to the order. (Doc. No. 3.) On June 10, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the already submitted application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. (Doc. No. 4.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiffs and contained notice that any objections to thereto were to be filed within twenty-one days from the date of service. (Id. at 3-4.) No. objections were filed.

On July 15, 2021, the findings and recommendations were adopted in part. (Doc. No. 5.) Plaintiff Joanna McKinley's application to proceed in forma pauperis was denied without prejudice. (Id. at 2.) Both plaintiffs were granted an additional twenty-one days from the date of entry of the order to submit long form applications to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee for this action. (Id.) Plaintiffs were also warned that if they failed to comply with the order, the action would be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee and failure to comply with a court order. (Id. at 3.) Plaintiffs did not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, pay the filing fee, or otherwise communicate with the court.

Accordingly,

1. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiffs' failure to obey a court order, and failure to pay the filing fee; and
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case for the purpose of closing the case and then to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McKinley v. Cnty. of Fresno

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 17, 2021
1:21-cv-00754-NE-SAB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2021)
Case details for

McKinley v. Cnty. of Fresno

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS MCKINLEY, II, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 17, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00754-NE-SAB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2021)