From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinley v. Brazier

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division
Aug 25, 2022
Civil Action 3:21-CV-528-DPJ-FKB (S.D. Miss. Aug. 25, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:21-CV-528-DPJ-FKB

08-25-2022

ANTHONY FRANK MCKINLEY PLAINTIFF v. DR. WILLIAM BRAZIER, ET AL. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

DANIEL P. JORDAN III CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On August 2, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball entered a Report and Recommendation [68] recommending that the Court grant Defendants' motions to dismiss and for summary judgment [29, 42, 44, 57, 66] and deny as moot Plaintiff Anthony Frank McKinley's motion for preliminary injunction [6] in this § 1983 case. McKinley did not file objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has now expired. The Court, having considered the unopposed R&R, adopts it as its opinion. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee's note (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). Defendants' motions [29, 42, 44, 57, 66] are granted; McKinley's claims are dismissed for failure to exhaust. McKinley's motion [6] is denied as moot. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.


Summaries of

McKinley v. Brazier

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division
Aug 25, 2022
Civil Action 3:21-CV-528-DPJ-FKB (S.D. Miss. Aug. 25, 2022)
Case details for

McKinley v. Brazier

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY FRANK MCKINLEY PLAINTIFF v. DR. WILLIAM BRAZIER, ET AL. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division

Date published: Aug 25, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:21-CV-528-DPJ-FKB (S.D. Miss. Aug. 25, 2022)