From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinlay v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 25, 2022
21-cv-1854 (AEK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-1854 (AEK)

03-25-2022

NICOLE MCKINLAY, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, Defendant.


ORDER

ANDREW E. KRAUSE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle in this matter. ECF No. 22. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed without costs to any party, and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court's calendar, provided the application is made within thirty (30) days of this Order. Any application to reopen that is filed after thirty (30) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis.


Summaries of

McKinlay v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 25, 2022
21-cv-1854 (AEK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2022)
Case details for

McKinlay v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP

Case Details

Full title:NICOLE MCKINLAY, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 25, 2022

Citations

21-cv-1854 (AEK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2022)