Opinion
3467-22
06-21-2022
MARK D. MCKIM & MARY K. MCKIM, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge
On March 2, 2022, the petition to commence this case was electronically filed. When a petition is electronically filed with the Court, the combination of the username and password of the individual eFiling the petition serves as the signature of the filer. If the petition requires a signature in addition to that of the eFilier, such as in a case where both spouses are petitioners, the Petition should be signed by the additional party. See DAWSON User Guides on the Court's website, www.ustaxcourt.gov. The petition in this case was electronically filed using petitioner Mark D. McKim's username and password, and thus the petition is treated as having been properly executed and filed by Mark D. McKim.
It has come to the Court's attention that the Petition was not properly executed in that it does not bear the signature of petitioner Mary K. McKim or of a practitioner admitted to practice before this Court. Upon due consideration and for cause, it is
ORDERED that on or before August 18, 2022, petitioner Mary K. McKim electronically file a proper ratification bearing her signature. Petitioner Mary K. McKim should note that an actual signature on a PDF or a signature using an authentication program (e.g., Adobe or DocuSign) are acceptable. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this case for lack of jurisdiction. It is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to attach to this Order a form that petitioner Mary K. McKim may use to comply with this Order.
RATIFICATION OF PETITION
___, have read the Petition filed with the Court on ___ and do hereby ratify and affirm the filing of said document by affixing my signature hereto.