From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKeown v. Verizon N.J. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Nov 27, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-5080 (WJM) (D.N.J. Nov. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-5080 (WJM)

11-27-2012

KEVIN MCKEOWN, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC., JAY BEASLEY, DENNIS GILL, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

A Report and Recommendation was filed on November 8, 2012 recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand be granted; and the parties having been given notice that they had fourteen days to object to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to Local Rule 72.1(c)(2); no objection or responses having been received; and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo; and good cause appearing;

It is on this 27th day of November, 2012

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate-Judge Mark Falk is hereby adopted as the Opinion of this Court; it is further

ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court of New Jersey.

_____________

WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

McKeown v. Verizon N.J. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Nov 27, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-5080 (WJM) (D.N.J. Nov. 27, 2012)
Case details for

McKeown v. Verizon N.J. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN MCKEOWN, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC., JAY BEASLEY, DENNIS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Nov 27, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-5080 (WJM) (D.N.J. Nov. 27, 2012)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Silgan Containers Mfg. Corp.

Following this clear and binding principle of law, this Court has on numerous occasions found that CBA…