From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKeown v. Hairston

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 11, 2007
Case No. 05-73244 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 11, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 05-73244.

September 11, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on several Motions in Limine filed by the parties. For the reasons stated on the record at a hearing held this date, IT IS ORDERED that:

1) The relief sought in Defendant's Motion in Limine seeking to require Plaintiff's medical treaters to testify regarding medical bills [Docket Entry No. 65] is DENIED.
2) Defendant's Motion in Limine seeking to preclude argument or testimony that Defendant had no right to be on Plaintiff's property on the night of the incident [Docket Entry No. 58] is GRANTED.
3) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine seeking to preclude the admission of letters from Dr. Friedman to Defense Counsel [Docket Entry No. 63] is GRANTED.
4) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine seeking to preclude testimony or exhibits relating to the arrest or conviction of James McKeown [Docket Entry No. 62] is GRANTED.
5) Plaintiff's Motion seeking to preclude narrative police reports [Docket Entry No. 61] is GRANTED.
6) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to preclude the admission the 911 Dispatch Tape [Docket Entry No. 67] is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McKeown v. Hairston

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 11, 2007
Case No. 05-73244 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 11, 2007)
Case details for

McKeown v. Hairston

Case Details

Full title:WENDY McKEOWN, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY PETER HAIRSTON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 11, 2007

Citations

Case No. 05-73244 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 11, 2007)