From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKeon v. Sherman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

April, 1915.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.


An application for an order to extend the time to serve a case must be made at Special Term, as that question is entirely within the cognizance of the Special Term and not of the appellate court. The question is different as to the time within which either the printed papers or the briefs must be filed. The objection is taken by the respondent that no order should be made here extending the plaintiffs' time to file the case. The motions are, therefore, denied, without costs, and without prejudice to an application to the Special Term.


Motion denied, without costs, without prejudice to an application to Special Term. Order to be settled on notice.


Summaries of

McKeon v. Sherman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

McKeon v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:WILHELMINA McKEON, Appellant, v . DAVID SHERMAN, Respondent. CHARLES C…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1915

Citations

168 App. Div. 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)