From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenzie v. Warden

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 12, 2024
5:22-cv-01508-AB (MAR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2024)

Opinion

5:22-cv-01508-AB (MAR)

04-12-2024

GAYLORD A. MCKENZIE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ANDRE BIROTTE JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED and Judgment be entered: (1) accepting this Report and Recommendation; (2) DENYING the Petition; and (3) DISMISSING this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

McKenzie v. Warden

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 12, 2024
5:22-cv-01508-AB (MAR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2024)
Case details for

McKenzie v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:GAYLORD A. MCKENZIE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 12, 2024

Citations

5:22-cv-01508-AB (MAR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2024)