From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenzie v. Schorgl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 2, 2011
Case No. 11-14907 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 11-14907

12-02-2011

RE v. NOLAN MCKENZIE, Plaintiff, v. STACI OLVERA SCHORGL, et al., Defendants.


Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

ORDER REQUIRING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT

On November 7, 2011, pro se Plaintiff Nolan McKenzie initiated this action by filing a pleading entitled "Petition Fraudulent Breach of Trust (Fiduciary Crime) Felony, Libel/Slander Will be Fully Executed at Law." (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff paid the filing fee for this action. He appears to be suing numerous individuals and entities. Plaintiff's complaint, however, fails to meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a).

Rule 8(a) requires that a complaint set forth a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief sought. The complaint must give the defendant "fair notice of what the plaintiff's claim is and the grounds upon which it rests." Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47, 78 S. Ct. 99, 103 (1957). Even though a pro se plaintiff is held to a less stringent pleading standard than a party who is represented by counsel, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520, 92 S. Ct. 594, 595 (1972), the complaint must meet some minimum standards. Id. at 521, 92 S. Ct. at 596. The Court is not required to "guess at the nature of the claim asserted." Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (1989).

Plaintiff's complaints fail to set forth the basis for this Court's subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff fails to cite to any federal statute or laws upon which he bases his claims against Defendants and a coherent factual basis for such claims. In fact, Plaintiff fails to set forth a coherent factual basis for any claim.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, that Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint that sets forth a basis for this Court's jurisdiction, a cause of action, and facts in support of such cause of action in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, OR THE COURT SHALL DISMISS THE COMPLAINT for lack of jurisdiction.

PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copy to:

Rev. Nolan McKenzie

11614 Foster Street

Overland Park, KS 66210


Summaries of

McKenzie v. Schorgl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 2, 2011
Case No. 11-14907 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 2, 2011)
Case details for

McKenzie v. Schorgl

Case Details

Full title:RE v. NOLAN MCKENZIE, Plaintiff, v. STACI OLVERA SCHORGL, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 2, 2011

Citations

Case No. 11-14907 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 2, 2011)