McKenzie v. Rush

Full title: MARK A. McKENZIE, Plaintiff, v. B.K. RUSH, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 28, 2006

CV F 05 0045 AWI WMW P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)

Opinion

CV F 05 0045 AWI WMW P.

August 28, 2006

ORDER RE: FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS (#18)

ANTHONY ISHII, District Judge

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 21, 2006, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on June 21, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.