From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenzie v. MAJ Transit, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 1994
204 A.D.2d 154 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 12, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Hansel McGee, J.).


We find that defendants did not establish that plaintiff's selection of Bronx County as the venue for the within action, based on the residence of defendant Henry Gibbs, Jr., was improper (see, CPLR 503 [a]). In light of the fact that defendant Gibbs' driver's license listed a Bronx address as his residence, his affidavit that he nevertheless lived at an address in Jamaica, Queens at the time of the accident was not sufficient, standing alone, to satisfy the defendants' burden of proof (see, Martinez v. Semicevic, 178 A.D.2d 228).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

McKenzie v. MAJ Transit, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 1994
204 A.D.2d 154 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

McKenzie v. MAJ Transit, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GARY McKENZIE, Appellant, v. MAJ TRANSIT, INC., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 12, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 154 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
611 N.Y.S.2d 191

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. 475 Doughty Boulevard, LLC

Discussion On a motion to change venue, a moving defendant has the initial burden to show that the venue…

Rivera v. Jensen

As documentary verification of his August 2001 residence change, plaintiff submitted his marriage certificate…