From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenzie v. Castellano

Florida Court of Appeals, Second District
Dec 9, 2022
No. 2D21-2971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2D21-2971

12-09-2022

FLOYD MCKENZIE, Appellant, v. MARK ANTHONY CASTELLANO and DANA MARIE CASTELLANO, Appellees.

Kristin M. Rhodus of Rhodus Law Firm, PLLC, St. Petersburg, for Appellant. Mark Castellano and Dana Castellano, pro se.


Appeal from the County Court for Pinellas County; John Carassas, Judge.

Kristin M. Rhodus of Rhodus Law Firm, PLLC, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Mark Castellano and Dana Castellano, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ, Concur

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.


Summaries of

McKenzie v. Castellano

Florida Court of Appeals, Second District
Dec 9, 2022
No. 2D21-2971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 9, 2022)
Case details for

McKenzie v. Castellano

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD MCKENZIE, Appellant, v. MARK ANTHONY CASTELLANO and DANA MARIE…

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Second District

Date published: Dec 9, 2022

Citations

No. 2D21-2971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 9, 2022)