From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenzie v. Baugh

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 1, 2007
235 F. App'x 111 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-6733.

Submitted: July 24, 2007.

Decided: August 1, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00315-RBH).

Dewayne McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Dewayne McKenzie appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing McKenzie's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McKenzie v. Baugh, No. 2:06-cv-00315-RBH, 2007 WL 1290353 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

McKenzie v. Baugh

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 1, 2007
235 F. App'x 111 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

McKenzie v. Baugh

Case Details

Full title:Dewayne McKENZIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sherrie BAUGH, Solicitor; Rick…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 1, 2007

Citations

235 F. App'x 111 (4th Cir. 2007)