From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re D.D.

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Feb 12, 2015
2014 N.D. 24 (N.D. 2015)

Opinion

No. 20140456 No. 20140457 No. 20140465 No. 20140466

02-12-2015

In the Interest of D.D., minor child McKenzie County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. D.D., child; H.D., child; C.R., mother; D.D., father, Respondents C.R., mother, Appellant In the Interest of H.D., minor child McKenzie County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. D.D., child; H.D., child; C.R., mother; D.D., father, Respondents C.R., mother, Appellant In the Interest of D.D., minor child McKenzie County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. D.D., child; H.D., child; C.R., mother; D.D., father, Respondents D.D., father, Appellant In the Interest of H.D., minor child McKenzie County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. D.D., child; H.D., child; C.R., mother; D.D., father, Respondents D.D., father, Appellant

Charles Burke Neff, Assistant State's Attorney, 201 5th Street NW, Suite 550, Watford City, ND 58854, for petitioner and appellee. Ashley Marie Gulke, P.O. Box 931, Minot, ND 58702, for appellant C.R. Richard Robert William Sand, 340 North Main, P.O. Box 1933, Watford City, ND 58854-1933, for appellant D.D.


Appeals from the Juvenile Court of McKenzie County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Robin Ann Schmidt, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Charles Burke Neff, Assistant State's Attorney, 201 5th Street NW, Suite 550, Watford City, ND 58854, for petitioner and appellee.

Ashley Marie Gulke, P.O. Box 931, Minot, ND 58702, for appellant C.R. Richard Robert William Sand, 340 North Main, P.O. Box 1933, Watford City, ND 58854-1933, for appellant D.D.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] C.R., mother, and D.D., father, of minor children D.D. and H.D., each appeal from the district court amended order terminating their parental rights. C.R. argues the district court lacked clear and convincing evidence that deprivation was likely to continue and that the children likely would suffer harm absent termination of parental rights. D.D., father, argues the district court erred when it found the causes of deprivation are likely to continue and that reasonable efforts were made to reunify the family after the children were removed. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstromdd


Summaries of

In re D.D.

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Feb 12, 2015
2014 N.D. 24 (N.D. 2015)
Case details for

In re D.D.

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of D.D., minor child McKenzie County Social Services…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Feb 12, 2015

Citations

2014 N.D. 24 (N.D. 2015)