Opinion
June, 1899.
Wm. F. Murry, for appellant.
Francis D. Hoyt, for respondent.
The complaint in this action avers that the defendant is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the state of New Jersey.
The answer does not deny this allegation, consequently that averment stands admitted on the record. That being so, the Municipal Court had no jurisdiction. Rieser v. Parker Co., 27 Misc. 205.
MacLEAN and LEVENTRITT, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, with costs to appellant.