From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenna v. Cisneros

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 3, 2023
2:22-cv-01294-KJM-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01294-KJM-CKD P

01-03-2023

EDWARD PHILLIP MCKENNA, Plaintiff, v. T. CISNEROS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court is plaintiff's first amended complaint along with several additional motions filed by plaintiff.

On October 25, 2022, the court dismissed plaintiff's original complaint and granted him leave to amend. ECF No. 26. However, the court limited any amended complaint to no more than 25 pages in length based on plaintiff's voluminous and repetitive filings. ECF No. 26 at 1112. Since the screening order was issued, plaintiff has filed three additional motions for a temporary restraining order, two sets of Objections to the Findings and Recommendations, a motion for an extension of time, a motion to exceed the court-ordered page limitation, and a 63 page first amended complaint. ECF Nos. 29-35, 37.

Plaintiff seeks an extension of time to file an amended complaint based on his inability to obtain photocopies and additional paper while incarcerated. ECF No. 32. Approximately a week later, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint along with a motion to exceed the page limitation indicating that he was “trying to keep it as close to 25 pages as possible.” ECF No. 34 at 1. However, plaintiff's first amended complaint more than doubled the court-ordered page limitation. See ECF No. 33.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs first amended complaint (ECF No. 33) is stricken from the docket as filed in violation of this court's October 25, 2022 court order.

2. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint (ECF No. 32) is granted.

3. Plaintiff's motion to exceed the court-ordered page limitation (ECF No. 34) is denied.

4. Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff may file a first amended complaint not to exceed 25 pages in length that complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. The amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned this case and must be labeled “Amended Complaint.”

5. Plaintiff's failure to file the amended complaint within the time provided or to follow the court's page limitation will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

McKenna v. Cisneros

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 3, 2023
2:22-cv-01294-KJM-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2023)
Case details for

McKenna v. Cisneros

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD PHILLIP MCKENNA, Plaintiff, v. T. CISNEROS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 3, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01294-KJM-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2023)