From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenna v. Bates

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Oct 3, 1896
36 A. 1133 (R.I. 1896)

Opinion

Demurrer, No. 105.

October 3, 1896

CLAIMS AGAINST TOWNS, HOW PROSECUTED; Whalen v. Bates, AFFIRMED.

Hugh J. Carroll, for plaintiff.

Thomas P. Barnefield, for defendant.

OPINIONS given by the judges of the Supreme Court to the Governor pursuant to Article 10, section 3, of the Constitution of Rhode Island.


RESCRIPT.

The plaintiff's claim for damages in this suit was presented to the board of aldermen of Pawtucket, and not to the city council as required by Pub. Stat. R.I. cap. 34, § 12. In Whalen v. Bates, Index RR. 105, we held that such a presentation of a claim was not a compliance with the statute. That case is decisive of the present.

Demurrer sustained, and case remitted to the Common Pleas Division with direction to enter judgment for the defendant for costs.


Summaries of

McKenna v. Bates

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Oct 3, 1896
36 A. 1133 (R.I. 1896)
Case details for

McKenna v. Bates

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET McKENNA, Adm'x., vs. FRANK M. BATES, City Treasurer

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Oct 3, 1896

Citations

36 A. 1133 (R.I. 1896)
19 R.I. 610

Citing Cases

Henry Weis Mfg. Co. v. Jones

"The leaving or filing of such a statement with an individual who happens to be a member of a corporate body…

State Budget Commission v. Lebus

It may "contract debts" only to the extent and in the manner provided by and within their limits. State ex…