McKelvy v. Choctaw Cotton Oil Co.

1 Citing case

  1. State ex Rel. v. Rumsey

    205 Okla. 307 (Okla. 1951)   Cited 3 times
    In State ex rel. Dept. of Highways v. Rumsey, 205 Okla. 307, 237 P.2d 448, although noting that the issue of damages was unimportant as the jury verdict for defendant was being affirmed on appeal, the Court discussed various cited authorities from Kansas, Arkansas and Texas which held that where a statute provided for the recovery of damages to a bridge itself, consequential damages could not be recovered.

    " Wertz v. Barnard, 32 Okla. 426, 122 P. 649. See, also, McKelvy v. Choctaw Cotton Oil Co., 72 Okla. 74, 178 P. 882; Equels, Admx., v. Tulsa City Lines, Inc., 194 Okla. 79, 147 P.2d 460; Schofield v. City of Tulsa, 111 Okla. 220, 239 P. 236. Plaintiff next argues that the court erred in giving the following instruction: