From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKelry v. Day

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 18, 2024
2:23-cv-10296-MWF-JDE (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-10296-MWF-JDE

01-18-2024

CLARENCE McKELRY, Plaintiff, v. EDWIN J. DAY, JR., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, including the Complaint (Dkt. 1), the Order Regarding Complaint issued by the assigned magistrate judge (Dkt. 4), and the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge issued on January 2, 2024 (Dkt. 7, “Report”). No party filed timely objections to the Report or timely sought additional time in which to do so. The Report is approved and accepted.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McKelry v. Day

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 18, 2024
2:23-cv-10296-MWF-JDE (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2024)
Case details for

McKelry v. Day

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE McKELRY, Plaintiff, v. EDWIN J. DAY, JR., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 18, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-10296-MWF-JDE (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2024)