Opinion
March, 1893.
James A. Deering, for defendant (appellant).
A.G.N. Vermilya, for plaintiffs (respondents).
The case is close, and not free from doubt; but, on all the evidence, we are of opinion that the proof was insufficient to warrant the inference that the broker procured a purchaser ready to buy on the terms of the defendant's offer.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered costs to abide event.