From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKee v. Lehman

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Feb 20, 2007
137 Wn. App. 1017 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007)

Summary

allowing an age difference of 13 years to support a prima facie claim but stating, “courts generally view age differences of 10 or more years as significant.”

Summary of this case from Oliver v. Spokane Cnty. Fire Dist. 9

Opinion

No. 57165-6-I.

February 20, 2007.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 02-2-05915-3, Anita L. Farris, J., entered September 30, 2005.


Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Ellington, J., concurred in by Coleman and Dwyer, JJ.


Summaries of

McKee v. Lehman

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Feb 20, 2007
137 Wn. App. 1017 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007)

allowing an age difference of 13 years to support a prima facie claim but stating, “courts generally view age differences of 10 or more years as significant.”

Summary of this case from Oliver v. Spokane Cnty. Fire Dist. 9
Case details for

McKee v. Lehman

Case Details

Full title:ILONA (MARY) McKEE, Appellant, v. JOSEPH LEHMAN, as Secretary of the…

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Date published: Feb 20, 2007

Citations

137 Wn. App. 1017 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007)
137 Wash. App. 1017

Citing Cases

Oliver v. Spokane Cnty. Fire Dist. 9

Plaintiff has also not established the fourth element of this WLAD claim because besides his lack of…