Opinion
419 CA 21-00495
04-22-2022
SMITH SOVIK KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (DAVID M. KATZ OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. WILLIAM MATTAR, P.C., ROCHESTER (MATTHEW J. KAISER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. THE LAW FIRM OF JANICE M. IATI, P.C., PITTSFORD (ELIZABETH K. OGNENOVSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
SMITH SOVIK KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (DAVID M. KATZ OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAM MATTAR, P.C., ROCHESTER (MATTHEW J. KAISER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
THE LAW FIRM OF JANICE M. IATI, P.C., PITTSFORD (ELIZABETH K. OGNENOVSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 33371[U], 2021 WL 8651843 [2021] ).