From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McIntyre v. Wright

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 6, 1982
643 P.2d 338 (Or. 1982)

Opinion

CA 19231, SC 28239

Argued and submitted March 4, 1982.

Reversed April 6, 1982.

On review from the Court of Appeals.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County (No. 376-325). Harlow F. Lenon, Judge. 54 Or. App. 248, 634 P.2d 493 (1981).

Darrell E. Bewley, Appellate Counsel, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the brief were K.R. Maloney, General Counsel, and James A. Blevins, Chief Trial Counsel, Salem.

Stanton F. Long, Deputy Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were David B. Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Al J. Laue, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before Denecke, C.J., and Lent, Linde, Peterson, Tanzer and Campbell, JJ.

Linde, J., did not participate in this decision.


TANZER, J.

Reversed.


This is a post-decree garnishment proceeding in a dissolution suit. The trial court allowed a continuing garnishment against defendant's workers' compensation benefits in the hands of the insurer. The Court of Appeals modified.

The issues in this case are identical to those presented in the case of Satterfield v. Satterfield, 292 Or. 780, 643 P.2d 336 (1982) (decided this date). Our decision in this case is based upon the reasons expressed in our opinion in Satterfield.

The Court of Appeals allowance of the garnishment is reversed.


Summaries of

McIntyre v. Wright

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 6, 1982
643 P.2d 338 (Or. 1982)
Case details for

McIntyre v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:McINTYRE, Respondent on Review, v. WRIGHT, Defendant, and STATE ACCIDENT…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 6, 1982

Citations

643 P.2d 338 (Or. 1982)
643 P.2d 338

Citing Cases

Satterfield v. Satterfield

Four members dissented. This case and McIntyre v. Wright, 292 Or. 784, 643 P.2d 338 (1982) (decided this…