From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McIntyre v. Liciardello

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 7, 2020
Civ. No. 13-2773 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2020)

Opinion

Civ. No. 13-2773

02-07-2020

JAMES MCINTYRE, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS LICIARDELLO, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2020, for the reasons provided in my Memorandum Opinion (Doc. No. 215), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Judgment is entered for Defendant City of Philadelphia as to Plaintiff's failure to train, supervise, or discipline Monell claim;

2. Judgment is entered for Defendants Thomas Liciardello and Michael Spicer as to Plaintiff's Claims for Intentional Inflection of Emotional Distress and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (Compl., Doc. No. 1, Counts XII & XIII); and

3. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 199 & 200) are otherwise DENIED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Paul S . Diamond

Paul S. Diamond, J.


Summaries of

McIntyre v. Liciardello

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 7, 2020
Civ. No. 13-2773 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2020)
Case details for

McIntyre v. Liciardello

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MCINTYRE, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS LICIARDELLO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 7, 2020

Citations

Civ. No. 13-2773 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2020)