McIntosh v. Wetzel

Full title: KEENAN McINTOSH, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 4, 2020

Civil Action No. 3:19-cv-125 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 4, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:19-cv-125

03-04-2020

KEENAN McINTOSH, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al., Defendants.

Judge Stephanie L. Haines

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This is a civil rights case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Keenan McIntosh ("Plaintiff"), a prisoner incarcerated at SCI-Houtzdale, against six named defendants. Plaintiff's amended complaint [Doc. 14] raises claims under the Eighth Amendment for inadequate prison conditions and under the Fourteenth Amendment for due process violations. This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge for proceedings in accordance with the Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U.S. C. § 636, and Local Civil Rule 72.D.

On December 23, 2019, Magistrate Judge Dodge filed a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed pursuant to the screening provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), for failure to state a claim under either the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendments [Doc. 26]. Plaintiff was notified that he had fourteen days from the date of service to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C.§ 636 (b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Civil Rule 72.D.2. Plaintiff did not file objections and the time to do so has expired.

Upon review of the record and the Report and Recommendation under the applicable "reasoned consideration" standard, see EEOC V. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (standard of review when no timely and specific objections are filed), and pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.D.2, the Court will accept in whole the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge in this matter. Accordingly, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 4^th day of March, 2020, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 26], which is adopted as the opinion of the Court, it hereby is ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice under the screening provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The Clerk of Court shall mark this matter closed.

/s/_________

Stephanie L. Haines

United States District Judge