From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McIntosh v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 21, 2020
603 S.W.3d 743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

WD 83060

07-21-2020

Miguel MCINTOSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Jeannie M. Willibey, for Appellant. Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, for Respondent.


Jeannie M. Willibey, for Appellant.

Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge and W. Douglas Thomson, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Miguel McIntosh appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. McIntosh was convicted of statutory sodomy in the first degree and child molestation in the first degree. McIntosh alleged in his Rule 29.15 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present mitigation evidence at his sentencing hearing through the admission of certain expert testimony and medical records relating to his mental health. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

McIntosh v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 21, 2020
603 S.W.3d 743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

McIntosh v. State

Case Details

Full title:Miguel MCINTOSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jul 21, 2020

Citations

603 S.W.3d 743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)