From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McIntosh v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 10, 2019
260 So. 3d 1196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D18-3653

01-10-2019

Christopher Charles MCINTOSH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Christopher Charles McIntosh, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Charles McIntosh, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

McIntosh v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 10, 2019
260 So. 3d 1196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

McIntosh v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER CHARLES MCINTOSH, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jan 10, 2019

Citations

260 So. 3d 1196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)