From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McIntosh v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Dec 15, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-550 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-550

12-15-2011

HERBERT D. MCINTOSH v. M. MARTIN


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, Herbert D. McIntosh, a federal prisoner currently confined at FCI Beaumont Low, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus contesting the legality of his conviction.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends this action be dismissed.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).

After careful consideration, the Court finds the objections lacking in merit. As the Magistrate Judge correctly concluded, petitioner has failed to meet his burden to show the inadequacy or ineffectiveness of a motion under Section 2255. To the extent petitioner now argues that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 violates the U.S. Constitution "Arising Under" clause of Article III and the Supremacy Clause, this claim must also be denied as without merit. None of the cases relied on by petitioner support this proposition. Petitioner's objections are overruled.

ORDER

Accordingly, the objections of petitioner are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

_____

Thad Heartfield

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McIntosh v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Dec 15, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-550 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 2011)
Case details for

McIntosh v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT D. MCINTOSH v. M. MARTIN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Dec 15, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-550 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 2011)

Citing Cases

Wiles v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Because the motion is pending and has not been denied, Wiles cannot show that § 2255 is inadequate or…

Alexander v. Myers

(“Because petitioner's Section 2255 motion is still pending, he clearly has another remedy to attack his…