From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McIntosh v. Inch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 22, 2021
324 So. 3d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-599

09-22-2021

Barry MCINTOSH, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Barry McIntosh, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gecelyne S. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Barry McIntosh, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gecelyne S. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Lewis, Makar, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McIntosh v. Inch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 22, 2021
324 So. 3d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

McIntosh v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:Barry MCINTOSH, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Department of…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Sep 22, 2021

Citations

324 So. 3d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)