From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McIlwain v. Burnside

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Dec 9, 2021
5:17-CV-363-MTT-MSH (M.D. Ga. Dec. 9, 2021)

Opinion

5:17-CV-363-MTT-MSH

12-09-2021

MARCO MCILWAIN, Plaintiff, v. DR EDWARD BURNSIDE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

STEPHEN HYLES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel Defendants to respond to his discovery requests (ECF No. 76). Under the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, “[m]otions to compel disclosure or discovery will not be considered unless they contain a statement certifying that movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the opposing party in an effort to secure the information without court action.” M.D. Ga. L. R. 37. Plaintiff failed to attach a statement indicating he attempted to confer with Defendants concerning the discovery requests raised in his motion to compel. His motion to compel is thus improper, and, therefore, is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McIlwain v. Burnside

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Dec 9, 2021
5:17-CV-363-MTT-MSH (M.D. Ga. Dec. 9, 2021)
Case details for

McIlwain v. Burnside

Case Details

Full title:MARCO MCILWAIN, Plaintiff, v. DR EDWARD BURNSIDE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Dec 9, 2021

Citations

5:17-CV-363-MTT-MSH (M.D. Ga. Dec. 9, 2021)