From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGuire v. Woodward

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Aug 3, 2023
Civil Action 1:20-CV-193 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:20-CV-193

08-03-2023

CURTIS JAMES MCGUIRE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY WOODWARD, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Curtis James McGuire, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit against Jeffrey Woodward, Shakietha Thomas and Emma Davis. Plaintiff alleges defendants Woodward and Thomas retaliated against him and that defendant Davis was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs.

The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that a motion to dismiss filed by the defendants be granted.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. In his objections, plaintiff referenced a response (#58) he filed to the motion to dismiss. The response was filed on the same day the Report and Recommendation was submitted. The court has considered the response, as well as plaintiff's objections.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections. After careful consideration, the court is of the opinion the objections are without merit. Even after considering the response to the motion to dismiss, plaintiff's allegations fail to demonstrate a constitutional violation on the part of the defendants for either retaliation or deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. As a result, the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity with respect to the claims against them in their individual capacities and Eleventh Amendment immunity to the extent they are sued in their official capacities.

ORDER

Accordingly, the objections filed by plaintiff in this matter (#61) are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the report of the magistrate judge (#57) are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. The motion to dismiss (#49) is GRANTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit.


Summaries of

McGuire v. Woodward

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Aug 3, 2023
Civil Action 1:20-CV-193 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2023)
Case details for

McGuire v. Woodward

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS JAMES MCGUIRE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY WOODWARD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Aug 3, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 1:20-CV-193 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2023)