From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGuire v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 28, 1961
135 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 1961)

Opinion

No. 31162.

November 28, 1961.

Ralph Lee McGuire, in pro. per.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


By petition for a writ of habeas corpus McGuire alleges that he is incarcerated in the State prison pursuant to an alleged illegal sentence imposed October 4, 1961. The errors alleged in the trial and ultimate sentence are matters which may properly be raised by appeal. The time for appeal has not yet expired. Section 924.09, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and Rule 6.2, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. A habeas corpus proceeding cannot be employed as a substitute for relief by appeal. A certified copy of the sentence attached to the return of the respondent supports the correctness of the allegations of the petition regarding the date of the imposition of sentence. The writ is, therefore, discharged and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the respondent but without prejudice to any rights which the petitioner may have to present by appeal to the proper court the alleged errors relied upon in the petition.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C.J., and HOBSON, DREW, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McGuire v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 28, 1961
135 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 1961)
Case details for

McGuire v. Cochran

Case Details

Full title:RALPH LEE McGUIRE, PETITIONER, v. H.G. COCHRAN, JR., DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 28, 1961

Citations

135 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 1961)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Donaldson v. Kelly

Where the accusatory pleading is not void, habeas corpus is not the proper remedy to review an order denying…

Michell v. State

We decline to discuss the question of the procedural propriety of the Writ of Habeas Corpus under these…